ArticleJournal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care2025
Lung Cancer Screening in the Incarcerated Population Through a Community Imaging Partnership.
Article in Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung Cancer in the Incarcerated Population: A Narrative Review.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Correctional Health and Oncologist Perspectives on Strategies to Improve Cancer Care in US Prisons: A Qualitative Study.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Cancer Screening in Incarcerated Populations.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Limited data exist on cancer screening in carceral facilities. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of a population-based lung cancer screening initiative in a carceral setting. This is a retrospective review of a lung cancer screening event at the Rhode Island Department of Corrections. Sentenced individuals meeting U.S. Preventive Services Task Force age criteria for lung cancer screening were mailed a letter asking about their smoking history. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans were offered to individuals who responded and met the criteria. Retrospective analyses examined patients' LDCT scoring using the American College of Radiology's Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS v1.1). Among more than 2,000 incarcerated individuals, 282 met the age criteria and 117 (41.5%) replied with interest in screening, of whom 57 (48.7%) verified as eligible. All 57 (100%) received LDCT. Most scans (94.4%) were categorized as Lung-RADS 1 or 2, indicating negative or benign findings. Comparisons with general population estimates showed no significant differences in Lung-RADS scores. The screening identified 21 incidental findings, including aortic aneurysms and severe coronary artery calcification. The implementation of lung cancer screening in a carceral setting was shown to be feasible and accepted by the incarcerated population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.