ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2025
Identifying non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the non-left bundle branch block.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important issue in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and non-left bundle branch block (LBBB). Electrocardiogram-gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography imaging (G-MPI SPECT) is typically used to assess left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. This study aimed to determine whether G-MPI parameters are associated with non-responsiveness to CRT.
methodsBetween January 2021 and December 2022, 128 patients underwent CRT, of whom 73 with preoperative evaluation using G-MPI were selected. Forty-three patients with non-LBBB (21 and 22 CRT responders and non-responders, respectively) and 30 patients with LBBB were analyzed.
resultsAmong patients with non-LBBB, CRT responders and non-responders exhibited no significant differences in baseline characteristics, except for the LV dimension. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 108° and 27.7° as the optimal cutoff values for the bandwidth and phase standard deviation (SD), respectively, to predict non-responsiveness to CRT (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.762; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.601-0.923 and AUC = 0.742; 95% CI 0.576-0.909, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed that a cutoff bandwidth of ≥ 108° and phase SD of ≥ 27.7° are independent predictors of non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with non-LBBB (hazard ratio 5.65; 95% CI 1.53-20.9; P = 0.009). In contrast, there were no significant associations between G-MPI parameters and non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with LBBB.
conclusionsPreoperative G-MPI might be associated with non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with non-LBBB, indicating that identifying potential non-responders can improve patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39752041What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.