Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39752015›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025

Predicting intermediate-risk prostate cancer using machine learning.

Miroslav Stojadinovic, Milorad Stojadinovic, Slobodan Jankovic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miroslav StojadinovicFaculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Svetozara Markovica 69, 34 000, Kragujevac, Serbia. midinac@gmail.com.
Milorad StojadinovicClinic for Nephrology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Slobodan JankovicFaculty of Medical Sciences, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesIntermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) is the most common risk group for localized prostate cancer. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that utilizes biopsy predictors to estimate the probability of IR PCa and assess its performance compared to the traditional clinical model.

methodsBetween January 2017 and December 2022, patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of ≤ 20 ng/mL underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies. Patient's age, PSA, digital rectal exam, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), and previous negative biopsy, number of positive cores, Gleason score, and biopsy outcome were recorded. Patients are categorized into no cancer, very low, low-, and intermediate-risk categories. The relationship between the model and IR PCa was investigated using binary generalized linear model (GLM) and assessed its discriminatory ability by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsAmong 729 patients, PCa was detected in 234 individuals (32.1%), with 120 (16.5%) diagnosed with IR PCa. The AUC for the novel model compared to the clinical model was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.722-0.889) versus 0.669 (95% CI: 0.543-0.790), with a p-value of 0.018. In DCA, the GLM outperformed the clinical model by over 7%, potentially allowing for an additional 44.3% reduction in unnecessary biopsies. The PSAD emerged as the most significant predictor.

conclusionWe developed a GLM utilizing pre-biopsy features to predict IR PCa. The model demonstrated good discrimination and clinical applicability, which could assist urologists in determining the necessity of a prostate biopsy.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentDiagnosisIntermediate-riskMachine learningProstate biopsyProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.