ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Defining Textbook Outcomes for Minimally Invasive Surgical Resection of Small Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) of the Stomach.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Minimally invasive transgastric resection of gastric GIST is a feasbile alternative to wedge resection.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Incorporating Tumor Location into Textbook Outcome Model for Minimally Invasive Gastric GIST Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Beyond R0: The Case for Function-Preserving Surgery in Defining Textbook Outcomes for Gastric GISTs.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic surgical approaches for various locations of gastrointestinal stromal tumours.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTextbook outcome (TO) has been utilized to assess the quality of surgical care. This study aimed to define TO rates for minimally invasive gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resections in a bi-institutional cohort.
methodsPatients with gastric GIST (≤ 5 cm) who underwent laparoscopic or robotic resection (January 2014 to January 2024) were retrospectively identified from two GIST centers. We excluded patients with concurrent procedures, tumor involvement of adjacent organs, or metastatic disease. To balance perioperative and oncologic outcomes, we defined TO as: R0 resection, no conversion to open surgery, operative time ≤ 120 min, no perioperative transfusions, no intraoperative complications, no Clavien-Dindo ≥ II complications, hospital length of stay (LOS) ≤ 3 days, no 90-day readmission or death, no tumor rupture, and recurrence-free status at 2 years (5% predicted recurrence risk for tumors with a low mitotic index).
resultsA total of 83 patients were included. TO was achieved in 62.7% of cases (N = 52). Mean tumor size was 3.0 ± 1.0 cm and 86.7% of GIST were modified-NIH low or very low risk (i.e., mitotic index ≤5/mm
conclusionsMinimally invasive gastric GIST resection is well-described. Herein, we propose new TO standards to serve as a measure of short- and long-term outcomes for monitoring institutional performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39751981What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.