Observational studyLung2025
The Contribution of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolation to Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with Exacerbations of Bronchiectasis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Observational study in Lung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genotypic and phenotypic landscape of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from respiratory and non-respiratory samples in a tertiary hospital.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Clinical and prognostic characteristics of stable bronchiectasis in adults with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: a prospective cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is increasingly severe in bronchiectasis patients. However, there is currently a lack of research on the clinical outcomes of carbapenem-resistant PA (CRPA) isolation in hospitalized exacerbations of bronchiectasis (HEB) patients. We investigated the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of PA and CRPA isolation in HEB patients.
methodsThis was an observational, retrospective cohort study of PA and CRPA isolated from sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cultures of HEB patients from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022. The primary outcomes were respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital stay. The incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of PA and CRPA isolation were analyzed using multivariate logistic and Poisson regression.
resultsAmong 1,286 patients, the prevalence of PA, CRPA, and multi-drug resistant PA isolation was 20.61% (n = 265), 3.81% (n = 49), and 5.83% (n = 75), respectively. CRPA isolation was associated with an increased risk for respiratory failure (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.29, 5.11]; p = 0.007), mechanical ventilation (aOR 3.65; 95% CI [1.50, 8.92]; p = 0.004), and length of hospital stay (Coefficient (Coef) 0.27; 95% CI [0.18,0.35]; p < 0.001) compared to non-CRPA. Antibiotic treatment decreased the risk of respiratory failure (aOR 0.37; 95% CI [0.17, 0.80]; p = 0.011), mechanical ventilation (aOR 0.36; 95% CI [0.13, 0.99]; p = 0.047), and length of hospital stay (Coef - 0.23; 95% CI [- 0.33, - 0.14]; p < 0.001).
conclusionsCRPA isolation was identified in more severe bronchiectasis patients and significantly increased the risk of respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay, while antibiotic treatment reduced this risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39751969What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.