Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39751955›Full record

Trial reportUrolithiasis2025

Ureteral access sheath or percutaneous nephrostomy during flexible ureteroscopy: which is better?

Mohamed Abdelrahman Alhefnawy, Moaz Fathy Ismail Abdelrahman, Hosam Abdel-Fattah Abo-Elnasr, Helmy Ahmed Eldib

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohamed Abdelrahman AlhefnawyUrology Department, Benha University, Benha, Qalubia, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6491-055X
Moaz Fathy Ismail AbdelrahmanUrology Department, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK.
Hosam Abdel-Fattah Abo-ElnasrUrology Department, Benha University, Benha, Qalubia, Egypt.
Helmy Ahmed EldibUrology Department, Benha University, Benha, Qalubia, Egypt. drhelmyeldeep@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1417-2261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies in literature discussed the drawbacks of the ureteral access sheath use in flexible ureteroscopy and in the same time mentioned the benefits of ureteral access sheath in decreasing the incidence of urosepsis and better stone free rate. In the current study we aim to compare between percutaneous nephrostomy tube (PCN) insertion before flexible ureteroscopy and conventional ureteral access sheath (UAS) flexible ureteroscopy in terms of safety, efficacy and perioperative outcomes. In all, 100 Patients aged 20 to 67 years with upper ureteric stones and mild hydronephrosis or renal pelvic stones less than 20 mm with mild hydronephrosis were randomized into 2 groups; patients undergoing PCN insertion before flexible ureteroscopy, and patients undergoing the conventional UAS flexible ureteroscopy. Patients with active urinary tract infection, patients with urinary diversions or malformations and patients with uncontrolled coagulable status were excluded from the study. Perioperative data were recorded. This study was conducted on 50 PCN group and 50 UAS group. Age varied from 20.0 to 67.0 years. Males consisted more than half of study groups, 52% of PCN group and 66% of UAS group. Weak significant difference was found in need for ureteral pre-operative stenting between groups (8% with PCN vs. 22% with UAS, p 0.04995). There was no significant difference between two groups in intra-operative complications (mucosal injury, failed operation, perforation, false passage and conversion to other procedure), but there was significant difference in bleeding between the groups (6% with PCN vs. 22% with UAS, p = 0.021). There was no significant difference between two groups in post-operative complications (infection, fever, pain, hematuria, other complications, stone free rate, readmission and stent duration), but there was significant decrease in operative time (48.85 ± 13.861 in PCN group versus 56.82 ± 14.61 in UAS group, p = 0.0003). We conclude that PCN insertion before flexible ureteroscopy provides a safe technique with comparable outcomes to UAS use.

Indexed as

Nephrostomy, PercutaneousUreterUreteroscopyAdultAgedFemaleHumansKidney CalculiMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsStentsTreatment OutcomeUreteral CalculiUreteroscopesYoung AdultAccess sheathFlexiblePercutaneous nephrostomyUreterUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID39751955
PMCPMC11698769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.