Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39751946›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025

Method to define recommended portion sizes for consumer guidance.

Alison L Eldridge, Evangelia Kotzakioulafi, Charlotte Debras, Li-Tang Tsai, Gert W Meijer, Fanny Salesse, Eileen R Gibney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison L EldridgeNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland. alison.eldridge@rdls.nestle.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9477-7130
Evangelia KotzakioulafiNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Charlotte DebrasNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Li-Tang TsaiNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gert W MeijerResearch and Development, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Vevey, Switzerland.
Fanny SalesseSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Eileen R GibneySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Nestlé Research Nestlé Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProvision of nutrition information is mandated for packaged foods, but few countries regulate serving sizes. Our objective was to develop a methodology to establish globally consistent portion size recommendations for both nutrient-dense and discretionary foods.

methodsA stepwise systematic approach incorporated portion values from serving size regulations (n = 10), food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG; n = 90, aggregated into 6 regions), and reported food intakes from Europe and Australia. Global Portion Values (GPVs) for 50 food groups were derived as the median of all data inputs. Consistency was evaluated using 25th and 75th percentiles and dispersion of input values (percent of median absolute deviations (MAD)/median).

resultsGPVs were calculated for 50 food groups organized into nine food categories: Milk/Dairy (n = 6 food groups), Protein Foods (n = 5), Mixed Dishes (n = 4), Grains (n = 7), Fruits/Vegetables (n = 5), Snacks/Sweets (n = 12), Sauces/Condiments (n = 5), Fats/Oils/Sugars (n = 4) and Beverages (n = 2). Data inputs for each portion value ranged from 6 to 18; only 4 foods had < 10 inputs; 21 had ≥ 15. Dispersion ranged from 0 to 33%; 88% of GPVs were considered "consistent" (dispersion < 25%) and 9 groups had 0% variation, indicating high consistency. Example GPVs include: 240mL for milk (16 inputs, 8% dispersion); 90 g for meat/poultry/fish main dishes (16 inputs, 13% dispersion); 50 g for bread/rolls (18 inputs, 20% dispersion); 130 g for canned vegetables (10 inputs, 2% dispersion); 30 g for chocolate (15 inputs, 17% dispersion); and 250mL for soft drinks (17 inputs, 20% dispersion).

conclusionsThis standardized approach provides clear and consistent portion recommendations that, if adopted, could help consumers make informed choices about appropriate portions.

Indexed as

Nutrition PolicyPortion SizeAustraliaEnergy IntakeEuropeFood LabelingHumansNutritive ValueRecommended Dietary AllowancesServing SizeFood-based dietary guidelinesPackaged foodsPortion recommendationPortion size

Identifiers

PMID39751946
PMCPMC11698800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.