Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39751927›Full record

Observational studyNeurosurgical review2025

Survival and immune microenvironment prediction of glioma based on MRI imaging genomics method: a retrospective observational study.

Zhihao Wang, Yunbo Yuan, Tao Cui, Biao Xu, Zhubei Zou, Qiuyi Xu, Jie Yang, Hang Su, Chaodong Xiang, Xianqi Wang and 12 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Imaging genomics of cancer: a bibliometric analysis and review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Zhihao Wang *Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yunbo Yuan *Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Tao CuiChengdu Science and Technology Development Center of CAEP, Chengdu, China.
Biao XuChengdu Science and Technology Development Center of CAEP, Chengdu, China.
Zhubei ZouChengdu Science and Technology Development Center of CAEP, Chengdu, China.
Qiuyi XuChengdu Science and Technology Development Center of CAEP, Chengdu, China.
Jie YangChengdu Science and Technology Development Center of CAEP, Chengdu, China.
Hang SuChengdu Science and Technology Development Center of CAEP, Chengdu, China.
Chaodong XiangSchool of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Xianqi Wang7T Magnetic Resonance Translational Medicine Research Center, Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Jing Yang7T Magnetic Resonance Translational Medicine Research Center, Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Tao ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Siliang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yunhui ZengDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lanqin DengDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Haoyu WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shuxin ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuan YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaofei HuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Wei Chen7T Magnetic Resonance Translational Medicine Research Center, Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Qiang YueDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. scu_yq@163.com.
Yanhui LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. liuyh@scu.edu.cn.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M742438National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271961National Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing cstc2021jcyj-msxm3744the Sichuan Provincial Foundation of Science and Technology 2023NSFSC1867the Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2023YFG0127the Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2023YFQ0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioma is characterized by high heterogeneity and poor prognosis. Attempts have been made to understand its diversity in both genetic expressions and radiomic characteristics, while few integrated the two omics in predicting survival of glioma. This study was intended to investigate the connection between glioma imaging and genome, and examine its predictive value in glioma mortality risk and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Clinical, transcriptomics and radiomics data were obtained from public datasets and patients in our center. Correlation analysis between gene expression and radiomic feature (RF) was performed, followed by survival analysis to select RF-related genes (RFRGs) and gene expression-related RFs (GRRFs). After that, RFRGs and GRRFs were used to construct mortality risk prediction model of all glioma and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild type (WT) glioma. The association between RFRGs and TIME was explored. Six cohorts composed of 1,754 glioma patients were included. Thirty-five genes and eighty-two RFs demonstrated high correlation with each other. Gene score based on RFRGs was independent predictor of both glioma (P < 0.05) and IDH-WT glioma (P < 0.05). Same score based on GRRFs was also able to stratify risk of both glioma (P < 0.0001) and IDH-WT glioma (P < 0.0001), with nomograms constructed separately. The TIME of gliomas predicted with RFRGs' score found mismatched risk of death with immune response. RFRGs and GRRFs were able to predict glioma mortality risk and TIME. Further studies could validate our results and explore this genome-imaging interactions.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaImaging GenomicsMagnetic Resonance ImagingTumor MicroenvironmentAdultAgedFemaleGenomicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesGliomaImaging genomicsImmune microenvironmentIsocitrate dehydrogenaseSurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.