Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39751783›Full record

ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2026

Deconstructing the Self-Other Binary in Care Networks by Unravelling Professional' Perspectives through an Intersectional Lens.

Aldiene Henrieke Hengelaar, Margo van Hartingsveldt, Tineke Abma, Petra Verdonk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aldiene Henrieke HengelaarDepartment Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Tafelbergweg 51, PO box 2557, 1000 CN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.h.hengelaar@hva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8908-1035
Margo van HartingsveldtDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tineke AbmaDepartment Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden University and Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Petra VerdonkDepartment Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Tafelbergweg 51, PO box 2557, 1000 CN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 023.011.009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many western countries informal care is conceived as the answer to the increasing care demand. Little is known how formal and informal caregivers collaborate in the context of an diverse ageing population. The aim of this study was to gain insight in how professionals' perspectives regarding the collaboration with informal carers with a migration background are framed and shaped by intersecting aspects of diversity. We used an intersectionality informed qualitative design with informal conversations (N = 12) and semi-structured interviews (N = 17) with healthcare professionals working with clients with Acquired Brain Injury. Two critical friends were involved in the analysis which was substantiated by a participatory analysis with a community of practice. We identified four interrelated themes: (a) 'The difficult Other' in which professionals reflected on carers with a migration background causing 'difficulties'; (b) 'The dependent Other' refers to professionals' realization that 'difficulties' are intensified by the context in which care takes place; (c) in 'The uncomfortable self' professionals describe how feelings of insecurities evoked by the Other are associated with an inability to act 'professionally', and; (d) 'The reflexive self' shows how some professionals reflect on their own identities and identify their blind spots in collaboration within a care network. These themes demonstrate the tensions, biases and power imbalances between carers and professionals, which may explain some of the existing health disparities perpetuated through care networks.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCaregiversHealth PersonnelBrain InjuriesCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAcquired brain injuryCare networksCollaborationInformal carersIntersectionality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.