ArticleOdontology2025
Palatal symmetry analysis of surgical protocols for oral clefts by 3D stereophotogrammetry.
Article in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the dimensional alterations of the dental arches and the palate symmetry in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate before and after the performance of primary surgeries by different surgical techniques. The sample was divided into Group 1, G1 - cheiloplasty (Millard technique) and single-stage palatoplasty (von Langenbeck technique); Group 2, G2 - cheiloplasty (Millard technique) and two-stage palatoplasty (Hans Pichler and Sommerlad techniques). The digital dental models were evaluated before (Time 1, T1) and after (Time 2, T2) primary surgeries. The straight linear (I-C, I-T, C-T, I-C', I-T', C'-T') and angular measurements (< ICT, < CTT', < IC'T', < C'T'T) were performed. Statistical analysis was applied with α = 5%. In the intragroup analysis, G1 and G2 showed a significant increase in T2 for all linear parameters except I-C' and I-T' and a decrease in all angular parameters except for < IC'T' in G1 and < CTT' in G2. In the intergroup analysis, at T2, there was an increase in C-T and I-T' and a decrease in < ICT for G2. Regarding the asymmetry in T1, for G1 and G2, we observed asymmetry in I-C vs I-C', I-T vs I-T', C-T vs C'-T', and < CTT' vs < C'T'T analyses. At T2, we observed asymmetry in all parameters except for I-T vs I-T' in G1 and for C-T vs C'-T' in G2. It is concluded that in following single-stage palatoplasty, there is symmetry in the total segment length, while two-stage palatoplasty is specifically effective in preserving symmetry in the posterior segment length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39751775What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.