ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2025
Patient Characteristics, Diagnoses, and Management in a Combined Uveitis-Rheumatology Clinic.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCombined uveitis-rheumatology clinics (combined clinics) are a relatively recent clinical care model. Here we report the demographics, ocular and systemic disease characteristics, and medications utilized in patients seen in a combined clinic at a tertiary care hospital in the USA.
methodsMedical records were reviewed of patients seen at the Combined Clinic at the University of Colorado Hospital between January 1, 2016 and November 1, 2023. Data including age, sex, referral indication, ocular and systemic inflammatory disease diagnosis, and therapies utilized were obtained.
resultsA total of 171 patients were included in the study, of which 122 were diagnosed with a systemic inflammatory disease, the most common of which were spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Nearly half of patients referred to the combined clinic with a known ocular inflammatory disease (OID) and suspicion for a systemic process were eventually diagnosed with a systemic disease. The most common associations in patients with both OID and systemic disease were anterior uveitis with spondyloarthritis, and scleritis with rheumatoid arthritis. The most common systemic immunomodulatory therapies (IMT) used were adalimumab, methotrexate, and rituximab. Over 40% of patients underwent a change in IMT during their first evaluation.
conclusionsMost patients seen in the combined clinic had both ocular and systemic inflammatory disease and were treated with IMT. Many patients were diagnosed with a systemic inflammatory disease upon evaluation in the combined clinic, and nearly half were recommended to initiate or change IMT at their first visit. This highlights the utility of a combined clinic in the management of these complex patients, in addition to providing logistical benefits to patients and educational opportunities for trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.