Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39751713›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2025

BayesAge 2.0: a maximum likelihood algorithm to predict transcriptomic age.

Lajoyce Mboning, Emma K Costa, Jingxun Chen, Louis-S Bouchard, Matteo Pellegrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Determining the age of single cells using scMLEAge.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lajoyce MboningDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Emma K CostaDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jingxun ChenDepartment of Human Genetics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Louis-S BouchardDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Matteo PellegriniDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. matteop@mcdb.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9355-9564

Funding

Training Grant in Genomic Analysis and InterpretationT32HG002536 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Valerie A Arboleda, Harold Pimentel · 2002 to 2026
$8.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is a complex biological process influenced by various factors, including genetic and environmental influences. In this study, we present BayesAge 2.0, an upgraded version of our maximum likelihood algorithm designed for predicting transcriptomic age (tAge) from RNA-seq data. Building on the original BayesAge framework, which was developed for epigenetic age prediction, BayesAge 2.0 integrates a Poisson distribution to model count-based gene expression data and employs LOWESS smoothing to capture nonlinear gene-age relationships. BayesAge 2.0 provides significant improvements over traditional linear models, such as Elastic Net regression. Specifically, it addresses issues of age bias in predictions, with minimal age-associated bias observed in residuals. Its computational efficiency further distinguishes it from traditional models, as reference construction and cross-validation are completed more quickly compared to Elastic Net regression, which requires extensive hyperparameter tuning. Overall, BayesAge 2.0 represents a step forward in tAge prediction, offering a robust, accurate, and efficient tool for aging research and biomarker development.

Indexed as

AgingAlgorithmsTranscriptomeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBayes TheoremFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLikelihood FunctionsMaleMiddle AgedAging clocksBayesAgeElastic Net regressionEpigenetic agetAgeTranscriptomic age

Identifiers

PMID39751713
PMCPMC12181495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.