ArticleBehavior research methods2025
A normative database of Swahili-Chinese paired associates.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past few decades, Swahili-English and Lithuanian-English word pair databases have been extensively utilized in research on learning and memory. However, these normative databases are specifically designed for generating study stimuli in learning and memory research involving native (or fluent) English speakers. Consequently, they are not suitable for investigations that encompass populations whose first language is not English, such as Chinese individuals. Notably, native Chinese speakers constitute a substantial proportion, approximately 18%, of the global population. The current study aims to establish a new database of translation equivalences, specifically tailored to facilitate research on learning, memory, and metacognition among the Chinese population. We present a comprehensive set of normative measures for 200 Swahili-Chinese paired associates, including recall accuracy, recall latency, error patterns, confidence ratings, perceived learning difficulty, judgments of learning, and perceived learning interestingness for the entire word pairs. Additionally, we include word-likeness ratings and word length for the Swahili words, and concreteness ratings, familiarity ratings, word frequency, and number of strokes for the Chinese words. This diverse array of measures, gathered across a substantial number of Swahili-Chinese word pairs, is poised to effectively support future research seeking to investigate the intricate processes of learning, memory and metacognition within the Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39751697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.