ArticleLung2025
Impact of Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Colonization on Clinical Characteristics, Antibiotic Treatment, and Clinical Outcomes of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia.
Article in Lung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- Therapeutic management of health care-associated pneumonia.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine effects of colonization with multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) in general wards on characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP).
methodsThis was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with HAP admitted to 16 tertiary or university hospitals in Korea from July 2019 to December 2019. From the entire cohort, patients who developed pneumonia in general wards with known colonization status before the onset of pneumonia were included in this study. Patients were categorized into a colonization group and a non-colonization group according to MDRB colonization. Patients of the two groups were then compared.
resultsAmong a total of 400 patients, 63 were in the MDRB colonization group. HAP caused by MDR-Staphylococcus aureus or MDR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa was more common in the colonization group than in the non-colonization group (24.4% vs. 8.1%, P = 0.006 or 20.0% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.013, respectively). Colonization with certain bacteria was correlated with subsequent infection with the same bacteria. Carbapenem use (36.5% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.044) and appropriateness of initial antibiotics (50.8% vs. 12.8%) were higher in the colonization group than in the non-colonization group. Although in-hospital mortality was similar in the two groups (34.9% vs. 32.9%, P = 0.759), hospital length of stay was longer (38 days vs. 31 days, P = 0.009) and rate of discharge to home was lower (34.1% vs 59.7%, P = 0.002) in the colonization group.
conclusionsColonization with MDRB might influence characteristics and treatment of HAP. However, prognosis of HAP was not associated with MDRB colonization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39751664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.