ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2025
Detection of Lip, Tongue, Masseter, and Temporalis Muscle Contractions with Electromyography Tools as an Early Diagnostic Medium for Dentoalveolar Malocclusion.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Possible Correlation Between Dental Occlusion and Craniomandibular Disorders by Means of TeethanJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to detect early class I, II, and III malocclusions through the muscle strength of the lips, tongue, masseter, and temporalis.The study subjects were 30 pediatric patients with predetermined criteria. The subjects were divided into class I, II, and III malocclusions where each classification of malocclusion amounted to 10 people. Subjects were differentiated according to gender and age. Tongue pressure during swallowing was recorded by a palatal measurement sensor system. The strength of the activity was assessed when the lip muscles resisted as hard as possible the traction plate placed between the teeth and the lips, then the force was connected to an electromyograph (EMG) to be measured. Temporal and masseter muscle contractions were assessed when the muscles performed swallowing, chewing, mouth opening, resting, mouth closing, and biting movements.Data analysis using the SPSS application was performed with the ANOVA test if the data distribution was normal, and if the data distribution was not normal, then the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Significant data were evaluated by post-hoc tests using least significant difference if the data distribution was normal or the Mann-Whitney test if the data distribution was not normal.It was found that there was a significant difference in the left masseter muscle and left temporalis muscle.EMG can be considered as a tool to detect class I, II, and III malocclusions through muscle contraction. Biting and chewing positions have satisfactory EMG examination results for malocclusion detection. Age and gender of the child may affect the results of EMG examination in certain conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.