ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Quick-and-Easy Validation of Protein-Ligand Binding Models Using Fragment-Based Semiempirical Quantum Chemistry.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Energy-Screened Many-Body Expansion for Protein-Ligand Interactions: Examining Convergence for Metalloenzymes Through Seven-Body Interactions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- GAMA: A Robust and Automated Fragment-Based Quantum Chemistry Method for Biomolecular Systems.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Hydroxyketone Tyrosinase Inhibitors: Mechanism of Action, Applications and Perspectives in Depigmentation and Melanoma Therapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Accurate and Rapid Ranking of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities Using Density Matrix Fragmentation and Physics-Informed Machine Learning Dispersion Potentials.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025Article
- Testing a Heterogeneous Polarizable Continuum Model against Exact Poisson Boundary Conditions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Fragme∩t: An Open-Source Framework for Multiscale Quantum Chemistry Based on Fragmentation.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic structure calculations in enzymes converge very slowly with respect to the size of the model region that is described using quantum mechanics (QM), requiring hundreds of atoms to obtain converged results and exhibiting substantial sensitivity (at least in smaller models) to which amino acids are included in the QM region. As such, there is considerable interest in developing automated procedures to construct a QM model region based on well-defined criteria. However, testing such procedures is burdensome due to the cost of large-scale electronic structure calculations. Here, we show that semiempirical methods can be used as alternatives to density functional theory (DFT) to assess convergence in sequences of models generated by various automated protocols. The cost of these convergence tests is reduced even further by means of a many-body expansion. We use this approach to examine convergence (with respect to model size) of protein-ligand binding energies. Fragment-based semiempirical calculations afford well-converged interaction energies in a tiny fraction of the cost required for DFT calculations. Two-body interactions between the ligand and single-residue amino acid fragments afford a low-cost way to construct a "QM-informed" enzyme model of reduced size, furnishing an automatable active-site model-building procedure. This provides a streamlined, user-friendly approach for constructing ligand binding-site models that requires neither
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.