Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39749896›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025

Telemedicine in cancer care: lessons from COVID-19 and solutions for Europe.

Anita Gottlob, Tugce Schmitt, Morten Sønderskov Frydensberg, Magdalena Rosińska, Victoria Leclercq, Katharina Habimana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anita GottlobGesundheit Österreich GmbH, National Institute of Public Health, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3109-2879
Tugce SchmittCancer Centre, Sciensano, National Public Health Institute, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-6428
Morten Sønderskov FrydensbergDepartment of Digital Innovation, Health Innovation Centre of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Magdalena RosińskaDepartment of Computational Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Victoria LeclercqCancer Centre, Sciensano, National Public Health Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
Katharina HabimanaGesundheit Österreich GmbH, National Institute of Public Health, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

eCAN Joint ActionEuropean Union 101075326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic challenged healthcare delivery, especially cancer care. Telemedicine emerged as an important tool to reduce disease transmission risks, maintain continuity of care, and improve accessibility. This study explores temporary measures during the pandemic as well as challenges and facilitators for integrating telemedicine into the European healthcare landscape in five case countries, focusing on cancer care. Expert interviews were conducted in five EU countries with diverse health systems: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Italy, and Poland. A thematic analysis was performed. Themes were further explored related to regulatory changes during COVID-19 as well as barriers and facilitators to telemedicine implementation. COVID-19 accelerated telemedicine uptake and processes (i.e. regulations, reimbursement) in all case countries. Acceptance of telemedicine increased among healthcare professionals and patients. Post-pandemic telemedicine use and acceptance declined to pre-pandemic levels in some countries and was attributed to several factors including preferences for in-person visits. Overall, persistent barriers were identified by all country experts including lack of standardized policies, data privacy concerns, technological infrastructure issues, and digital literacy gaps. Telemedicine was validated by all country experts as an important tool to enhance cancer care access and efficiency and to help maintaining continuity of cancer care during crises. Our findings highlight some overlapping barriers and suggest solutions to overcome these barriers across the selected countries. Recommendations for policymakers are listed, emphasizing the importance of telemedicine services in improving healthcare access, efficiency, and resilience. Future research should incorporate diverse population studies, patient perspectives, cost-effectiveness, and policy impacts.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsTelemedicineDelivery of Health CareEuropeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39749896
PMCPMC11832154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.