Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39749866›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

The Nursing Staff's Understandings of Spiritual Care in an Oncology Clinic in 2003 and 2023: A Mixed Method Longitudinal Study.

Mikael Lundmark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mikael LundmarkDepartment of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6635-6075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIM(S): To explore the understandings of spiritual care among nursing staff at an Swedish oncology clinic, with a special focus on changes over time.

designQualitative, longitudinal, descriptive design.

methodsA questionnaire-based replication study conducted in 2003 (N = 68) and 2023 (N = 47), comparative and thematic analysis.

resultsThe thematic analysis generated four main themes in 2023: (i) Relate to the whole person-spiritual care as an approach, (ii) enable an atmosphere of humanity and security around the patient-spiritual care as a nursing intervention, (iii) enable the patient to live out their spirituality or practice their religion-spiritual care that focuses on practical aspects directly linked to practising a religion and (iv) awareness of the importance of one's own approach to spiritual care-spiritual care that focuses on the personal qualities of the caregiver. Compared with 2003, there are many similarities but also some differences: the importance of one's own approach is more emphasised in 2023, and there is an increased awareness that nursing interventions can be different depending on who the patient is and who the caregiver is; spiritual care is more clearly characterised by an effort to relate to the whole person and the understanding of what can/should be included in the framework of spiritual care is broader.

conclusionThe concept of 'spiritual care' can change over time and can depend on societal changes. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: When studying understandings of the concept of 'spiritual care' in a nursing context or evaluating studies on the topic, the stability of the concept of 'spiritual care' over time should be accounted for. REPORTING

methodWhen applicable: SRQR. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: None.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelNeoplasmsNursing StaffOncology NursingSpiritualityAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedencase studylongitudinal studynursingoncologyreligiosityreligiousnessspiritual carespirituality

Identifiers

PMID39749866
PMCPMC12159390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.