ArticleVascular specialist international2024
Long-term Patency and Complications of Endovascular and Surgical Revascularization for Takayasu Arteritis.
Article in Vascular specialist international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical Tips for Surgical Treatment of Takayasu Arteritis.Vascular specialist international · 2025Review
- The interplay of ferroptosis and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of aortic dissection.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a rare form of chronic vasculitis that is common in Asian female. As TAK predominantly affects young female with a longer life expectancy than those with atherosclerotic diseases, assessing the specific long-term outcomes of TAK treatment is important. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and post-procedural complications of surgical and endovascular treatment for TAK. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective observational study reviewed 545 consecutive patients diagnosed with TAK between 1983 and 2020 at Seoul National University Hospital. Of these, 56 patients who underwent 73 extracardiac interventions were enrolled in the study. The data included clinical features, angiographic and laboratory findings, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes. Results: The mean age of the participants was 40.3±20.3 years, with a predominance of female (75.0%). The mean follow-up duration was 147.7±111.6 months. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (n=42, 75.0%), followed by heart failure (n=12, 21.4%). The most frequent symptom of TAK was uncontrolled hypertension (n=36, 64.3%). The renal artery (n=23, 31.5%) was the most frequently revascularized vessel, followed by the supra-aortic branches, including the innominate, subclavian, vertebral, and carotid arteries (n=19; 26.0%). In the endovascular group, the primary patency rates at 5, 10, and 20 years were 42.2%, 31.7%, and 17.0%, respectively. The rates in the surgical group were 84.4%, 75.7%, and 59.0%, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The difference in the secondary patency rates between the two groups was not statistically significant. The most common early complication (≤1 month) was arterial dissection (n=4, 5.5%), whereas the most prevalent late complication (>1 month) was restenosis, which occurred significantly more frequently in the endovascular group than in the surgical group (55.0% vs. 12.1%, P<0.001). Conclusion: Surgical and endovascular treatments for TAK are safe. However, restenosis develops more frequently after endovascular treatment compared to surgical treatment, particularly within the first three years. Increased periodic serial monitoring is recommended during this period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.