ArticleTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2025
The incidence of snakebite in South Africa and the challenges associated with lack of reporting.
Article in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimates of global burden of snakebite: A literature review and geostatistical modelling study.PLoS medicine · 2026Review
- Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality Among Paediatric Snakebite Patients in Northeastern Nigeria: A Survival Analysis Study.Wellcome open research · 2026Article
- A database on the historical and current occurrences of snakes in Eswatini.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSnakebite is a public health challenge that has a substantial impact on humans and snakes. Annually, millions of people are affected by snakebite globally but there is a paucity of detailed data on snakebite incidences. The aim of this study was to assess the patterns of snakebite incidences in South Africa.
methodsWe collected data from hospital records, information from the National Snakebite Database and records from the AfriTox Telelog database from 2011 to 2024.
resultsThe combined dataset showed that 3496 snakebite incidences have been recorded over 12.5 years. The prevalence was calculated to be 5.63 per 100 000 individuals of the population for South Africa, with the highest prevalence in KwaZulu-Natal (8.89). Males made up 65.9% of snakebite incidences and most incidences were recorded between November and March. The snake species responsible for most snakebite incidences was Bitis arietans.
conclusionSnakebite is generally well managed in South Africa with few recorded deaths despite the relatively high number of bites. However, incidents are often not recorded or have missing information particularly regarding the circumstances of the bite. Our study provides insight on the snake species responsible for snakebite incidences in South Africa and can be used to create prevention measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.