Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39749426›Full record

ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2025

Why we need a representative organization of academic PRM in Europe, and why we need it now.

Gerold Stucki, Henk J Stam, Francesca Gimigliano, Stefano Negrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gerold StuckiFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland; Center for Rehabilitation in Global Health Systems, WHO Collaborating Center, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland; Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland. gerold.stucki@paraplegie.ch.
Henk J StamDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0451-0705
Francesca GimiglianoDepartment of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1905-6405
Stefano NegriniDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences, University of Milan "La Statale", Milan, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1878-2747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing relevance of rehabilitation in healthcare to address increasing patient needs necessitates robust Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) integration into medical education and practice. Academic PRM, rooted in medical faculties, is vital for developing the medical speciality as an academic discipline across Europe, where it faces challenges, including limited representation in medical schools and competition for resources with established disciplines. This commentary advocates establishing a representative organization for academic PRM in Europe. Currently, no organization adequately represents academic PRM at the European level. The lack of academic chairs and departments in some countries undermines PRM's credibility and visibility, making it less attractive to students and prospective academics. An organized effort could provide a platform for knowledge exchange, policy formulation, and advocacy, ultimately strengthening the discipline's presence in medical faculties. Immediate action is crucial, particularly in light of the WHO's call for action 2030 and its 2023 resolution emphasizing the need for rehabilitation within health systems. A representative European academic PRM organization could advocate for education on rehabilitation across all medical specialities and enhance the understanding of functioning as a health indicator. It would also support the development of national academic organizations across Europe and facilitate collaboration with other stakeholders, including patient organizations, rehabilitation professionals, and funding agencies. Critical considerations for creating this organization include defining core activities, establishing governance principles focused on representativity and inclusion, and fostering relationships with existing national, European, and international organizations of PRM and academic medicine. By leveraging successful models like the Association of Academic Physiatrists in the United States, Europe can develop a robust and credible voice for academic PRM. This initiative is timely and necessary to capitalize on the current momentum and ensure the future of academic PRM in Europe.

Indexed as

Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineEducation, MedicalEuropeHumansSchools, Medical

Identifiers

PMID39749426
PMCPMC11680898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.