Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39749424›Full record

Observational studyJournal of rehabilitation medicine2025

Eye tracking to support assessment of patients with prolonged disorder of consciousness - a case series.

Jan Johansson, Marika Möller, Kristina Franzon, Jonas Stenberg, Alison K Godbolt

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Eye movements as indicators of awareness in prolonged disorders of consciousness: a scoping review of behavioral and neural evidence.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan JohanssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. jan.johansson.1@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1093-4179
Marika MöllerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8700-5186
Kristina FranzonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jonas StenbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5769-7959
Alison K GodboltDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4511-6181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate if eye tracking can support detection of covert voluntary eye movements and to compare these findings with a simultaneously performed clinical assessment according to the Coma Recovery Scale manual regarding visual stimuli.

designObservational case series. SUBJECTS: Twelve outpatients with prolonged disorders of consciousness recruited from the rehabilitation clinic of a regional rehabilitation unit.

methodEye movements were recorded with a wearable eye tracker while performing 4 test items from the Coma Recovery Scale Revised. The clinical assessment and recorded eye movement responses were analysed for agreement.

resultsResponse data was obtained from 238 out of 288 trials. Eye-tracking data were obtained in median 89.6% of the trials (37.5-100%). The eye tracking assessment judged a significantly higher percentage of trials as a response (46.2%) compared with the clinical assessment (18.1%), mainly in test items "visual pursuit" and "visual fixation".

conclusionEye tracking showed potential to be more effective in the detection of putative voluntary eye movements compared with conventional examination. Based on the findings in this and previous studies, eye tracking may serve as a useful complementary tool when examining patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness.

Indexed as

Consciousness DisordersEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39749424
PMCPMC11681144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.