Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39749392›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2025

Long-term Satisfaction with CO2 Laser Treatment for Moderate to Major Rhinophyma: A Single-centre Study.

Berta Olafsdottir, William Jebril, Philip Curman, Etty Bachar-Wikström, Jakob D Wikström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Rhinophyma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its epidemiology, associations, and treatment outcomes.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Berta OlafsdottirDermatology and Venereology Division, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
William JebrilDermatology and Venereology Division, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dermato-Venereology Clinic, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Philip CurmanDermatology and Venereology Division, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dermato-Venereology Clinic, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Nordiska kliniken, Stockholm, Sweden, Sweden.
Etty Bachar-WikströmDermatology and Venereology Division, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jakob D WikströmDermatology and Venereology Division, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dermato-Venereology Clinic, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Nordiska kliniken, Stockholm, Sweden, Sweden. jakob.wikstrom@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhinophyma, a severe manifestation of rosacea, predominantly affects Caucasian males aged 50-70 and is characterized by thickening and enlargement of the nasal skin. The condition can seriously both impact cosmetic appearance and obstruct nasal breathing. While its appearance is distinct, conditions such as basal cell carcinoma can mimic it, complicating diagnosis. Treatment options for rhinophyma range from medical therapies to surgical interventions, with CO2 laser resurfacing emerging as the gold standard due to its precision and minimal blood loss. This retrospective case series evaluates the long-term efficacy and patient satisfaction of CO2 laser treatment in 11 male patients treated between 2015 and 2023 at the Karolinska University Hospital. The results revealed sustained positive outcomes, with 92% of patients reporting high satisfaction and 55% experiencing improved nasal airflow post-procedure. Despite some instances of hypopigmentation and scarring, no major side effects were reported. The study supports CO2 laser treatment as a safe and effective option for moderate to major rhinophyma in Caucasian male patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-III. The importance of considering skin type, where extra caution must be employed when treating skin types IV-VI, should be emphasized as the treatment.

Indexed as

Lasers, GasPatient SatisfactionRhinophymaAgedHumansLaser TherapyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39749392
PMCPMC11697134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.