Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39749259›Full record

ArticleJVS-vascular insights2024

Mechanical thrombectomy devices for the management of pulmonary embolism.

Yash K Pandya, Edith Tzeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JVS-vascular insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yash K PandyaDivision of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh.
Edith TzengDivision of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh.

Funding

Vascular Surgery Research Training (VascTrain) ProgramT32HL098036 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Edith Tzeng · 2010 to 2026
$7.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to review the most commonly used percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy devices for the treatment of pulmonary embolism today. Methods: A thorough search of the existing literature was conducted on commonly used percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy devices, most notably Inari Flowtriever, Penumbra's Indigo Aspiration, and Alphavac. Reported qualitative and quantitative information was abstracted and descriptively reviewed to ascertain the clinical utility and effectiveness of these devices. Results: Inari Flowtriever is one of the most frequently utilized thrombectomy devices with the most substantive industry-sponsored trial data. Penumbra's Indigo Aspiration is one of the up-and-coming devices that presents certain caveats in addition to the commonly utilized features of a percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy device, making it a viable alternative. Other newer devices such as Alphavac still lack substantial data, with some other lesser-known devices sporadically used and showing limited, primarily anecdotal evidence. Conclusions: Each device has its positives and negatives. Data are growing on the clinical utility of these devices as their use is becoming more common. However, the long-term durability and overall cost-effectiveness remains to be determined. (JVS-Vascular Insights 2024;2:100053.).

Indexed as

AlphavacInariMechanical thrombectomyPenumbraSubmassive pulmonary embolism

Identifiers

PMID39749259
PMCPMC11695062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.