Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39749239›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Rural patients' satisfaction with humanistic nursing care in Chinese Public Tertiary Hospitals: a national cross-sectional study.

Chuang Li, Ning Wang, Haixin Zhang, Yongguang Yan, Huiling Chen, Ruxin Jiang, Yulan Chang, Pingfan Zhao, Qiaomei Cheng, Bing Song and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chuang LiHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Ning WangDepartment of Orthopedic, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Dezhou Hospital, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Haixin ZhangHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yongguang YanHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Huiling ChenHeart Center of Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Ruxin JiangHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yulan ChangDepartment of Nursing, Henan Vocational College of Nursing, Anyang, Henan, China.
Pingfan ZhaoHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Qiaomei ChengHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Bing SongDepartment of Orthopedic, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Dezhou Hospital, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Shujie GuoHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The provision of high-quality healthcare services and patient satisfaction are fundamental objectives in modern healthcare. Humanistic nursing care, which emphasizes empathy, respect for individuality, and cultural sensitivity, aims to build trust and improve the overall experience for patients. This approach is especially relevant for rural patients in China, who often face additional challenges in accessing care in large tertiary hospitals. Methods: A multistage, stratified sampling method was employed to collect data from 8,263 patients aged 18 years or older in large public tertiary hospitals. Humanistic care satisfaction scores were measured using the Nurse Caring Instrument (NCI) questionnaire, a validated tool for assessing patient satisfaction with nursing care. Results: Satisfaction with nursing humanistic care among rural Chinese patients attending large tertiary public hospitals was low with the overall mean satisfaction score 81.62 ± 16.85. Significant differences in satisfaction were found based on age, marital status, number of children, educational attainment, occupation, monthly household income, department visited, type of medical insurance, and first-time visitor. A multivariate analysis revealed positive correlations with satisfaction for factors such as having children, higher education, higher family monthly income, and first-time visitor, and negative correlations for factors such as older age, being widowed, department visited, and region. Conclusion: Older adults, widowed individuals, and first-time patients expressed lower levels of satisfaction, highlighting the need for tailored interventions. The findings provide insights into the impact of humanistic nursing care for rural patients and emphasize the importance of culturally sensitive approaches to improve patient satisfaction in rural China. This study has several limitations. The cross-sectional design restricts the ability to establish causal relationships, and there is a potential for selection bias, as participants who completed the survey may have higher educational and economic levels, possibly leading to an overestimation of satisfaction. Lastly, as this study focused on rural patients in large public tertiary hospitals in China, the findings may not be generalizable to other settings or patient groups. Future studies should address these limitations for broader applicability and insight.

Indexed as

Hospitals, PublicPatient SatisfactionRural PopulationTertiary Care CentersAdolescentAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumanismHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing CareChinese Public Tertiary Hospitalscross-sectional studyhumanistic nursing carepatient satisfactionrural patients

Identifiers

PMID39749239
PMCPMC11693737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.