Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39749226›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2025

Access to Healthy Built and Natural Environments and Physical Activity and Screen Time in New Zealand Adolescents: A Geospatial Cross-Sectional Study.

L Marek, J Wiki, S Mandic, J C Spence, M Smith, E García Bengoechea, K J Coppell, S Kingham, M Hobbs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

L MarekGeoHealth Laboratory University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5473-8930
J WikiGeoHealth Laboratory University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-687X
S MandicAGILE Research Ltd Wellington New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4126-8874
J C SpenceSedentary Living Lab Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8485-1336
M SmithSchool of Nursing University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0987-2564
E García BengoecheaDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster Health Research Institute University of Limerick Limerick Ireland.
K J CoppellDepartment of Medicine University of Otago Wellington Wellington New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-2874
S KinghamGeoHealth Laboratory University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2869-3756
M HobbsGeoHealth Laboratory University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8398-7485

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The built and natural environment can facilitate (un)healthy behaviors in adolescence. However, most previous studies have focused on examining associations between singular aspects of the environment. This study examined the association between the mixture of health-promoting and health-constraining environmental features in a Healthy Location Index (HLI) and physical activity and screen time among adolescents. This cross-sectional study used data from the Built Environment and Active Transport to School (BEATS) Research Program based in Dunedin, New Zealand. Data from 1,162 adolescents with complete demographic, health behavior and spatial records were included in the analysis. The environment was defined using the HLI based on access to health-promoting (e.g., greenspace, blue space, physical activity facility) and health-constraining (e.g., fast-food outlets) features and their mixture. Quantile g-computation and multilevel mixed effects models, with adolescents nested within schools, examined associations between the environment and the two health behaviors. A positive association existed between meeting physical activity guidelines and access to health-promoting environments (OR = 1.23 [95% CI 1.03; 1.47]), particularly blue space. In addition, the mixture of health-promoting and health-constraining environments was also important (ψ = 1.18 [1.01; 1.37]). However, there was limited evidence of an association between the environment and screen time. We provide evidence of a relationship between health-promoting environments, the mix of health-promoting and health-constraining environments, and physical activity among adolescents. The findings support the hypothesis that the environment has the potential to positively influence healthy behaviors of youth, particularly when it comes to physical activity.

Indexed as

adolescentsbuilt environmentenvironmental mixturegeospatialmultilevel modelingphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID39749226
PMCPMC11694138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.