ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
A pharmacovigilance study of the association between proton pump inhibitors and tumor adverse events based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective treatments for acid-related disorders but may pose tumor risks with long-term use. Current research on PPI-associated tumor adverse events (TAEs) is limited and inconclusive. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the relationship between PPIs and TAEs. Methods: We analyzed PPI adverse reaction reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database spanning from 2004 to 2024, focusing on five commonly used PPIs: esomeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, and rabeprazole. We conducted a disproportionality analysis utilizing the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) to identify potential TAEs associated with PPIs. We conducted univariate logistic regression analysis to explore the influencing factors. Results: A total of 3,133 TAEs were identified, representing 2.36% of all PPI-related adverse events (AEs). The most common TAEs were gastric cancer (19.05%) and malignant neoplasm (7.23%). Disproportionality analysis revealed ten significant TAEs associated with PPIs, including gastric adenocarcinoma and renal cell carcinoma. The median age of those reporting TAEs was 59 (interquartile range [IQR]: 51-70), and 29.70% of them resulted in a fatality. TAEs associated with PPIs were less likely to occur in elderly patients (65-75: OR = 0.91 [0.87-0.95], Conclusion: TAEs constitute a small but significant fraction of PPI-related AEs. This study highlights the need for cautious long-term use of PPIs and further research to understand the underlying mechanisms and risk factors. Clinicians should be aware of the potential tumor risks associated with prolonged PPI treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.