Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39749169›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of applied & basic medical research

Challenges in Implementing Competency-based Medical Education in India - Stakeholders' Perspective: A Mixed-method Analysis.

Sulena Sulena, Ashwin Kulkarni, Medha Mathur, Naresh Jyoti, Tanvir Kaur Sidhu, Dinesh Badyal, Ranjit Guha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Stakeholder Perspectives on the Family Adoption Program in a Newly Established Rural Medical College, Odisha: A Qualitative Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sulena SulenaDivision of Neurology, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College, Faridkot, Punjab, India.
Ashwin KulkarniDepartment of General Medicine, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Medha MathurDepartment of Community Medicine, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Naresh JyotiDepartment of Pharmacology, Adesh Medical College, Shahabad, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India.
Tanvir Kaur SidhuDepartment of Community Medicine, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Dinesh BadyalDepartment of Pharmacology, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Ranjit GuhaDepartment of Anatomy, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Competency-based Medical Education (CBME) was introduced in the year 2019 in India. It has brought about major changes in medical education. The curriculum is learner centric, outcome based, focuses on the development of core competencies and professionalism. However, many institutions have faced challenges during the implementation of the CBME curriculum. This study was aimed at assessing the challenges faced by all the stakeholders (students, faculty, and administrators) of various medical institutions and gather their insights on proposed solutions. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of 3 months, from October 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The study was conducted in 32 medical colleges across India. A total of 60 faculty of various disciplines, 32 administrators of the institutes, and 580 undergraduate medical students were included in the study. Perception of students and faculty was collected using a validated survey form. One-on-one interview was done for all the 32 administrators using a facilitator guide. A mixed-methods approach was used for quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis. Results: Around 40 (66.6%) faculty opined that that deficiency of trained faculty was a significant challenge in implanting CBME curriculum. Twenty (33.3%) of the faculty felt that there is a lack of adequate infrastructure required for the implementation of CBME curriculum. Among the administrators surveyed, 12 (37.5%) felt that dwindling student attendance was a major challenge, whereas 10 (31.5%) felt that there was the lack of collaboration between universities, colleges, and regulatory authorities. Four hundred and twenty-five (73.2%) of students opined that simulation-based training and 435 (75%) students opined that electives were very good initiatives by CBME curriculum. The students found the inclusion of integrated teaching, Attitude, Ethics, and Communication Module, early clinical exposure, and Family Adoption Programme in the CBME curriculum helpful. Conclusion: CBME curriculum was largely accepted across all the medical colleges. The training of faculty and administrators was considered an important challenge which needs to be considered. Students opined that the newer curricular reforms enhanced their learning.

Indexed as

challenges in competency-based medical educationCompetency-based medical education curriculumfoundation courseintegrated teachingstudent centric

Identifiers

PMID39749169
PMCPMC11691106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.