ArticleInternational journal of applied & basic medical research
Assessing the Effectiveness of Student-generated Scenario-based Questions as a Tool for Active Learning.
Article in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Active learning is not new as an educational philosophy and its benefits over passive learning modes are well known. In a competency-based framework, active learning is one of the key thrust areas. However, across the globe studies have shown that its implementation is wrought with challenges and limitations. The present study explored the implementation and effectiveness of an innovative technique of active learning where students in small groups of 5-6 construct structured scenario-based questions (SBQs) and learn in the process of making questions. Objectives: The study was done with the objective of assessing the effectiveness and feedback of student-generated SBQs as a method of active learning among medical students. Materials and Methods: Sensitization about the project was done followed by deciding the topics which could be covered with this method. The method was implemented in Physiology for Phase 1 MBBS students. During implementation, two small groups (25 students each) were randomly assigned into a "study group" and two into a "control group." The students were given trigger topics, learning resources and then asked to make SBQs in sub-groups of 5-6. The questions were then opened to discussion, comments and answering by the peers. Knowledge obtained was compared by a pre-post analysis within-group using paired Results: The study group recorded a statistically significant higher score (11.92 ± 2.2) after the activity as compared to control group (8.04 ± 2.24). Feedback received from participants and faculty was positive with a mean score of more than 4 on a 5-point Likert Scale for all items, except feasibility in which the faculty feedback score was 3.67. Out of 49 participating students, 31 students commented on qualitative feedback that it was engaging. More than half (26) students mentioned they "want more such sessions." Conclusion: The present study showed that this activity can be implemented in small group teaching hours of the timetable. It retains the benefits of active learning both in terms of learning outcomes and experientially. It can also be used as a means to implement problem-based learning and early clinical exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.