ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
Clinical Differences Between Survivors and Non-Survivors of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: The Roles of Sulbactam/Ampicillin and Methicillin-Resistant
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adult Empyema Caused by Refractory Methicillin-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most lethal complications in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, critical issues of non-survivors vary and are still unclear in VAP patients. Methods: The clinical differences between survivors and non-survivors of VAP were retrospectively analyzed in patients hospitalized from April 2023 to March 2024. Results: Of a total of 42 VAP patients, 22 (52.4%) survived, and 20 died. Survivors were significantly younger (69.1 vs 71.7 years, p < 0.01) and received sulbactam/ampicillin (SAM) as the initial antibiotics, significantly more (45.5% vs 10%, p = 0.006) than non-survivors. The male/female ratio and wards where they were managed were similar in both groups, but methicillin-resistant Conclusion: These data suggest that VAP patients who survived were younger and received treatment with narrow-spectrum antibiotics, such as SAM. Isolation of MRSA might be critical. These findings could influence antibiotic protocols and ICU management strategies to prevent infection with resistant bacteria to improve the prognosis of patients with VAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.