ArticleMateria socio-medica2024
General Health of Healthcare Professionals With Low Back Pain.
Article in Materia socio-medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of morbidity in the healthcare profession. It is a complex problem of the biopsychosocial factors (BPS) effect, where processing mechanisms affect the experience of pain, function, participation in society and personal prosperity. Psychological factors are important predictors of poor outcomes because they can significantly influence pain management and coping. Objective: To determine the prevalence of psychological factors, the difference in general health and the tendency toward psychological dysfunction of healthcare professionals with low back pain at different levels of healthcare system. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in five primary, secondary and tertiary level healthcare institutions in Boka Kotorska, Montenegro (December 2021 - July 2022). The study involved 192 subjects with LBP who voluntary entered the study and met the inclusion criteria. The study instrument was the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), which provides information on mental health by identifying symptoms of distress. The data were analyzed using the Results: The study included n=67 (34.9%) respondents working at secondary level, n=63 (32.8%) at the primary level and n=62 (32.3%) working at tertiary level, predominantly female. Analysis of the psychological factors representation indicate significant differences in overcoming difficulties (p=0.05), enjoyment in daily activities (p=0.042) and feelings of happiness and progress (p=0.004). There were statistically significant differences in general health and in the tendency to psychological dysfunction (p=0.005). Tendency to somatic symptoms is most prevalent at primary (55.6%) and tertiary (51.6%) healthcare level. Respondents working at Secondary level showed a tendency towards social dysfunction, anxiety and depression (50.7%, 17.9% and 3%). Conclusion: Psychological factors are represented differently in the healthcare profession. A statistically significant difference was found among healthcare professionals of the examined levels, especially in the feeling of inability to overcome difficulties, enjoyment in usual daily activities, and feeling of happiness and progress. There is also a significant difference in the representation of psychological dysfunction at the primary, secondary and tertiary levels of healthcare, while general health is most impaired among healthcare professionals working at the secondary level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.