ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2024
Factors Associated with Recurrent Emergency Department Visits for Epistaxis in Adults, Cross Sectional Study in Two Tertiary Care Hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Recurrent Emergency Department Visits for Epistaxis in Adults, Cross Sectional Study in Two Tertiary Care Hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [Letter].Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of recurrent and active epistaxis in adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) and explored the association of recurrent epistaxis with demographic characteristics, comorbidities and medications, and types of emergency interventions in adult epistaxis patients. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted with data from Eds of two tertiary hospitals over three years, from January 2019 to January 2022. All adult patients aged ≥18 years with active epistaxis not resolved by pressure on the nose or head positioning were included. Demographic data, details of clinical presentation and clinical management were collected from the patient's electronic medical records. Results: Of 404 patients, 73 (18.1%) revisited the ED with recurrence of epistaxis within 28 days. There was a male predilection in the study, with an average age of 55.4 ± 18.03. Most patients had unilateral (n = 328, 81.2%) and anterior (n = 376, 93.1%) nasal bleeding. Heart failure as a comorbidity was associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrent epistaxis (p = 0.001). The most common treatments included expandable polyvinyl acetate packs (EPAP) (n = 198, 49%); topical xylometazoline (n = 108, 26.7%); and chemical cautery (n = 57, 14.1%). EPAP for controlling initial bleeding was significantly associated with ED revisits due to epistaxis (p = 0.033). Conclusion: The prevalence of recurrent epistaxis mostly occurs in older-aged males. Congestive heart failure may be an under-recognised risk factor for recurrent epistaxis. In patients with a high risk of epistaxis recurrence, other treatment modalities should be sought aside from expandable polyvinyl acetate packs as they can increase the risk of rebleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.