ArticleConference proceedings. IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing2024
Wheeze and Crackle Discrimination Algorithm in Pneumonia Respiratory Signals.
Article in Conference proceedings. IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A new pneumonia detection method is proposed to provide both pneumonia detection in respiratory sound signals and wheeze and crackle discrimination when pneumonia episodes are detected. In the proposed method, two-step hierarchy, classifying pneumonia in the first step and discriminating wheezing and crackling in the second step, is considered; the conventional pneumonia detection method is modified to improve pneumonia detection performance, while wheezing and crackling discrimination functionality is added to facilitate the application of appropriate remedies for each case. We used resampling techniques to address the imbalance in the ICBHI pneumonia dataset. The random forest algorithm is used to classify pneumonia from healthy respiratory data, as well as to distinguish between wheeze and crackle from pneumonia data. Against the ICBHI respiratory dataset, the proposed random forest-based hierarchy pneumonia detection method provides 85.40% accuracy in detecting pneumonia and 82.70% accuracy in discriminating wheeze from crackling, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.