ArticleCureus2024
Microsurgical Resection of Meningiomas Using a 4K Three-Dimensional Exoscope: A Descriptive Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Prior to using the exoscope, we speculated that it represented an intermediate tool between a loupe and a microscope and had concerns about its visibility of deep, fine structures. Objective To evaluate the depths of meningioma for which the exoscope was suitable, and to clarify its disadvantages in meningioma resection. Methods Findings of consecutive meningioma surgeries using a 4K three-dimensional (3D) exoscope over a one-year period were evaluated for visibility of the surgical field, comfort of the surgeon's arm posture, the surgeon's head orientation, and perception of the image delay, accounting for the depth of the tumor. Results Seven meningiomas were resected using a 4K 3D exoscope (three superficial, three intermediate, and one deep). The exoscope allowed the surgeon to observe deeply located fine structures as clearly as with a conventional microscope and to operate more comfortably on meningiomas of all depths with arms flexed. On the contrary, the exoscope occasionally required the surgeon to operate with his head unnaturally turned to one side because of the immobility of its large monitor, despite the wide insertion availability of its camera from various directions to meningiomas located superficially or within the middle cranial fossa. No time delays between the surgeon's manipulations and the 3D images were perceived in all meningioma surgeries. Conclusions The 4K 3D exoscope was suitable for operations on all depths of meningiomas. The discrepancy between the surgeon's manipulation and gaze directions was its disadvantage. It is anticipated that further development of the 3D monitor will address this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.