ArticleCureus2024
The Usefulness of Mandibular Anglectomy in Patients With Masticatory Muscle Tendon-Aponeurosis Hyperplasia: A Preliminary Single-Center Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound radiomics features for identifying the masseter muscle in patients with masticatory muscle tendon-aponeurosis hyperplasia: A pilot study.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Masticatory muscle tendon-aponeurosis hyperplasia (MMTAH) is a recently identified condition characterized by restricted mouth opening due to hyperplasia of the temporalis muscle tendon and masseter muscle aponeurosis. This study examines the treatment and clinical course of patients with MMTAH who underwent surgery at our hospital. Subjects and methods The study included 14 patients (four males and 10 females; mean age: 33.9 years; age range: 17-50 years) who were clinically diagnosed with MMTAH at our hospital between 2008 and 2020. The surgical procedure, as well as the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative mouth opening range of each patient, were examined. Results In all cases, the mouth opening range significantly improved postoperatively. Patients who underwent mandibular anglectomy showed a significantly greater mouth opening range both preoperatively and postoperatively compared to those who did not undergo the procedure. Additionally, mandibular anglectomy was effective in maintaining the mouth opening range at six months in patients who underwent the procedure, in contrast to those who did not. Conclusions Mandibular anglectomy appears to be effective in maintaining the mouth opening range in patients with MMTAH. While additional case studies are needed to confirm our findings, we believe that mandibular anglectomy is a valuable treatment option for MMTAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.