ArticleCureus2024
Comparative Evaluation of Two Doses of IV Dexamethasone for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Segment Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Effective postoperative analgesia following lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) is crucial for promoting surgical recovery and fostering maternal-neonatal bonding. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two IV dexamethasone doses (8 mg and 4 mg) in managing postoperative pain in LSCS patients. The objective was to assess whether the 4 mg dose provides comparable pain relief to the 8 mg dose, with the goal of identifying the optimal dosage for effective pain management with minimal side effects. Methods This prospective, randomized, interventional comparative study was conducted on 70 parturients undergoing LSCS under spinal anesthesia (SA). The participants were randomly assigned into two groups of 35 each. Group A received 8 mg of IV dexamethasone, while Group B received 4 mg intravenously after the delivery of the baby. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, time to first rescue analgesia, total rescue analgesic consumption within 24 hours, duration of sensory and motor blockade, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and blood sugar levels were measured every six hours up to 24 hours post-surgery for both groups. Results The results revealed a significantly lower VAS score in Group A compared to Group B (p < 0.05). However, the incidence of PONV and the duration of sensory and motor blockade were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). Blood sugar levels were higher in Group A at all time points (p < 0.05). Conclusions The 4 mg dose of dexamethasone appears to be a better alternative for postoperative analgesia compared to the 8 mg dose in patients undergoing LSCS under SA. It was associated with a lower mean VAS score, a reduced incidence of PONV, and a smaller increase in blood sugar levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.