ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Palinopsia associated with the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib during the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: two case reports.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most frequently used standard treatment for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer patients consists of a CDK4/6 inhibitor (abemaciclib, ribociclib, or palbociclib) combined with endocrine therapy. Despite CDK4/6 inhibitors being part of routine care in the last few years, new adverse events continue to be reported. Here, we report two cases of palinopsia, a rare neurological visual disturbance that refers to the persistence or recurrence of a visual image after the removal of visual stimuli in patients treated with ribociclib and letrozole. Neuro-ophthalmological assessments and brain MRIs did not find any organic cause. However, palinopsia was related in a time- and dose-dependent manner to the intake of ribociclib. Following a one-level dose reduction of ribociclib, palinopsia was mild and well tolerated. Both patients continued the treatment with ribociclib, with one of them for almost 2 years. Based on the identification of two cases in our hospital in a short period of time, it is tempting to suggest that ribociclib-related palinopsias may not be uncommon. We propose that physicians should be aware of this ribociclib-associated adverse event. Patients presenting this symptom should undergo a routine workup (neuro-ophthalmological assessment and brain MRI) and, if negative, be reassured of its relation with ribociclib as well as the safety of continuing on this drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.