ArticleHeliyon2024
Real-world clinical results of CGRP monoclonal antibody treatment for medication overuse headache of migraine without abrupt drug discontinuation and no hospitalization.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persistence and Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation of Anti-CGRP Therapies in Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-World Studies.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
- Deprescribing and Anti-CGRP preventive therapy in medication-overuse headache associated with migraine: pathophysiological rationale and single-center real world evidence.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2026Article
- Continuation, Resumption, and Withdrawal Rates of CGRP-mAb Treatment for Migraine Under Real-World Clinical Conditions in Which Patients Are Free to Choose Own Treatment.Neurology international · 2025Article
- CGRP-targeted therapeutics for migraine: a clinical trial landscape analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Differences in Patient-Physician Satisfaction for Migraine Treatment Medications in Patients with and without Medication-Overuse Headache: A Cross-Sectional Real-World Survey.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and medication overuse headache: is stopping excessive pain medication still necessary?Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Review
- Identifying Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Lasmiditan 50 mg as an Acute Treatment for Migraine Attacks Under Various Dosing Conditions in Real-World Clinical Practice.Neurology international · 2025Article
- Efficacy of the herbal medicine Chotosan following treatment with Western medications for migraine accompanied by tension-type headache.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Abrupt discontinuation of overused medications is standard treatment for medication overuse headache (MOH), but discontinuation is difficult to maintain. The aim was to evaluate the real-world clinical results of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody (CGRP-mAb) treatment for migraine with MOH without abrupt drug discontinuation and no hospitalization. Methods: Data were collected before starting CGRP-mAb injections (baseline) and 1 month after each injection. The following items were compared between baseline and after the first, second, and third CGRP-mAb injections, monthly headache days (MHD), monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly acute medication use (AMU) days, monthly total amount of AMU tablets, headache impact test-6 (HIT-6), and the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire (MSQ). Achieving reduction rates ≥50 % in the frequency of each headache and migraine was defined as a good response. Achieving reduction rates of both AMU days and tablets ≥50 % was defined as effective in reducing AMU. Results: This study included 33 patients with migraine with MOH. After the third CGRP-mAb injection, MHD and MMD were significantly decreased from median 30.0 to 9.5 days, and 10.0 to 1.5 days, respectively. In addition, monthly AMU days and tablets were significantly decreased from median 28.0 to 8.0 days, and 30.0 to 9.5 tablets, respectively. After the third CGRP-mAb injection, the good MHD and MMD responder rates were 75.0 % and 85.7 %, respectively. The rate of reducing AMU was 78.6 %. HIT-6 and MSQ scores decreased significantly from baseline to after each CGRP-mAb injection. Conclusions: When CGRP-mAb was administered to migraine with MOH, frequency of headache symptoms and AMU were reduced without abrupt drug discontinuation and no hospitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.