Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748977›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Improvement of beam type element models of welded tubular junctions for fatigue analysis using artificial neural networks.

JesusAngel Perez, Ingo Kaiser, Francisco Badea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

JesusAngel PerezDepartment of Construction and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Area, University of Oviedo, 33203, Gijón, Spain.
Ingo KaiserDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Automotive, Nebrija University, Santa Cruz de Marcendo 27, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco BadeaDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Automotive, Nebrija University, Santa Cruz de Marcendo 27, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of numerical methods for structural analysis has been increasingly integrated within the design process in different engineering fields over the last decades, inasmuch as the capacity of the computing resources have growth. This gave rise to calculation techniques based on virtual models such as the finite element method, which is nowadays a reference method for evaluation of complex tubular structures with vast application in the industry. For such type of structures, modeling approaches based on beam type elements are usually employed since they provide simplicity and low computational costs. Nevertheless, these elements have the drawback that they cannot account for local geometric characteristics and therefore consider and strain concentrations consequence of the local joint geometry. These local strains are of special concern in welded junctions subjected to fatigue loads, since are the ones that will most probably lead to failure. Consequently, improving beam type elements takes special relevance. In this scenario, the present paper evaluates a novel methodology to improve strain results of beam element type models of welded T-junctions using artificial neural networks to predict the correction values depending on the junction geometry and load type. Detailed validated models are used as reference for network training. The paper first evidence the importance of the adequate selection of the training data set in the network precision and a methodology to ensure the best network selection is described. Then, the network capability to correct beam element type deviations is demonstrated. The obtained results show that the aid of neural networks to finite element beam T-junctions models can improve local strain result deviations by more than 90 % in most cases, which potentially allows performing fatigue analysis using this simplified modelling technique.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networksFatigueFinite element analysis

Identifiers

PMID39748977
PMCPMC11693883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.