ArticleHeliyon2024
Novel tools for evaluating COVID-19 at the emergency department: Surfactant protein D level and CHARISMA score.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of radiograph scoring systems to assess pulmonary disease severity in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the serum surfactant protein D (SP-D) level required to determine the diagnosis and prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and create a new scale for disease prognosis prediction. Methods: This study was conducted among 64 patients with COVID-19 symptoms and 16 healthy volunteers. The participants were assessed by comparing "Controls/Patients", "PCR-negative/PCR-positive", "Simple COVID-19/Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-accompanied COVID-19", "Mild ARDS/Moderate-severe ARDS", and "Survived/Dead" subgroups. Serum SP-D levels and pulmonary infiltration area (volume and percentage) measurements on CT were compared between the groups. A new scale, the "CHARISMA Score", was created by logistic regression method for a complete prognosis assessment. This includes confusion, heart rate, age, respiratory rate, percentage of infiltration on CT, serum SP-D level, mean arterial pressure and SaO Results: Serum SP-D levels differed significantly across the groups. There was a strong correlation between SP-D levels and infiltration volumes. CHARISMA scores were higher in the severe than in the mild ARDS group and in patients who died than in survivors. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the CHARISMA scores, a cutoff value of 4 indicated mortality. Conclusion: Serum SP-D levels can be used to determine COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis, and the CHARISMA score can be used to predict prognosis and mortality risk in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.