ArticleHeliyon2024
Bovine brucellosis, associated risk factors and preventive measures in industrial cattle farms.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Global to Local: A Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression Analysis of Bovine Brucellosis Risk Factors.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Epidemiological Trends and Strain Distribution of Bovine Brucellosis in Vaccinated Industrial Dairy Cattle (2021-2024).Veterinary medicine international · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Four Serological Assays for Bovine Brucellosis and Optimised Cutoff Thresholds in an Endemic Region of Iran.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective management of brucellosis in human populations is closely tied to controlling the disease in domestic livestock. This study focused on identifying determinants of brucellosis prevalence in mixed industrial dairy and beef cattle farms within Isfahan Province, Iran. Employing a case control design, we compared 32 ranches with documented brucellosis within the previous year (12 months) to 38 farms with no brucellosis during the same timeframe. The comparison examined the farms' adherence to health protocols for raising cattle. Utilizing multivariable logistic regression, the study identified several significant risk factors linked to brucellosis prevalence. These included cleaning milking accessories with a water and chlorine solution (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.99), cleaning water troughs daily (OR 0.20, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.89), the cows' density per square meter (OR 0.14, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.75), being within 2000 m of another cattle ranch with brucellosis (OR 4.02, 95%CI 1.09 to 14.84) and ovine farms situated within a 500-m radius (OR 8.43, 95%CI 1.66 to 42.70). No meaningful difference was observed in vaccination frequency between infected and non-infected farms (P = 0.645). While vaccination is essential for preventing bovine brucellosis, robust biosecurity measures are crucial for effective disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.