Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748967›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

A bibliometric analysis of biopesticides in corn pest management: Current trends and future prospects.

Amik Krismawati, Yustisia Yustisia, Zainal Arifin, Titik Purbiati, Diding Rachmawati, Evy Latifah, Nicky Rahmana Putra, Irianto Irianto, Lailatul Qomariyah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amik KrismawatiResearch Center for Horticulture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Complex Cibinong Science Center-BRIN, Cibinong, 16911, West Java, Indonesia.
Yustisia YustisiaResearch Center for Food Crop, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Complex Cibinong Science Center-BRIN, Cibinong, 16911, West Java, Indonesia.
Zainal ArifinResearch Center for Horticulture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Complex Cibinong Science Center-BRIN, Cibinong, 16911, West Java, Indonesia.
Titik PurbiatiResearch Center for Horticulture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Complex Cibinong Science Center-BRIN, Cibinong, 16911, West Java, Indonesia.
Diding RachmawatiResearch Center for Horticulture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Complex Cibinong Science Center-BRIN, Cibinong, 16911, West Java, Indonesia.
Evy LatifahResearch Center for Horticulture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Complex Cibinong Science Center-BRIN, Cibinong, 16911, West Java, Indonesia.
Nicky Rahmana PutraResearch Center for Pharmaceutical Ingredients and Traditional Medicine, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Complex Cibinong Science Center-BRIN, Cibinong, 16911, West Java, Indonesia.
Irianto IriantoDepartment General Education, Faculty of Resilience, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Lailatul QomariyahDepartment of Industrial Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 60111, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This bibliographic review paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the scholarly literature on biopesticides utilized in corn pest management, employing a bibliometric approach to identify current trends and prospects in the field. The growing demand for sustainable agricultural practices has fueled interest in biopesticides as effective alternatives to conventional chemical pesticides. By systematically examining relevant publications, this review synthesizes the collective knowledge on biopesticide applications in corn production, encompassing various types of biopesticides, their modes of action, efficacy against key corn pests, and environmental considerations. The study synthesizes recent advances in microbial, botanical, and biochemical biopesticides such as Bacillus thuringiensis, neem extracts, and linalool, highlighting their specificity, minimal environmental impact, and potential to reduce pest resistance. It delves into the modes of action, including insecticidal activity, feeding disruption, and pest reproduction inhibition. The review also outlines an integrated pest management (IPM) strategy that combines biopesticides with agronomic practices, including crop rotation, biological control agents, and resistant crop varieties. This combined approach aims to enhance pest suppression, improve yield sustainability, and reduce chemical pesticide reliance. The findings provide valuable insights into sustainable corn pest management practices, promoting environmental conservation and agricultural productivity. Ultimately, this review aims to provide researchers, policymakers, and practitioners with a valuable resource for understanding the current landscape of biopesticides in corn pest management and guiding future research directions toward sustainable crop protection strategies.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisBiopesticidesCornCorn pest managementCorn production

Identifiers

PMID39748967
PMCPMC11693921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.