ReviewFrontiers in medicine2024
Efficacy and safety of wet cupping in the treatment of neurodermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Traditional Health Practices May Promote Nrf2 Activation Similar to Exercise.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neurodermatitis is a chronic skin condition characterized by intense itching and skin thickening due to neurological dysfunction. Its persistent nature poses a challenge to effective treatment, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Wet cupping therapy is increasingly being used in clinics to manage neurodermatitis, so it is imperative to assess the evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety. Objective: This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of wet cupping therapy in patients with neurodermatitis. Methods and analysis: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating wet cupping for neurodermatitis were identified through searches of eight electronic databases and three clinical trial registration platforms from inception to March 2024, using predefined search terms. Included studies underwent quality appraisal using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Assessment tool. The quality of evidence was assessed independently by two reviewers using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System (GRADE). Meta-analysis and publication bias assessment were conducted using ReviewManager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software, respectively. Results: This review encompassed 19 studies, comprising 6 types of comparisons and involving 1,505 participants. The findings revealed no significant difference in the total effective rate between wet cupping alone and high-potency steroids ( Conclusion: The efficacy of wet cupping therapy is comparable to that of high-potency steroids. Its combined use with medication or moxibustion appears to enhance effectiveness, reduce recurrence rates, and improve safety. However, due to the overall low grade of evidence for the identified outcomes and poor methodological quality, caution is advised when interpreting and applying these findings in clinical practice. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier: CRD42024524398.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.