Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748911›Full record

ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2024

"They talked to me like I was dirt under their feet:" Treatment and withdrawal experiences of incarcerated pregnant people with opioid use disorder in four U.S. states.

Carolyn Sufrin, Tali Ziv, Lauren Dayton, Carl Latkin, Camille Kramer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Justice Core: An Innovative Response to Incarceration During Pregnancy in North Carolina.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carolyn SufrinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 4940 Eastern Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Tali ZivJohns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, 1809 Ashland Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Lauren DaytonDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Carl LatkinDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Camille KramerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 4940 Eastern Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.

Funding

Treatment for Incarcerated Pregnant Women with Opioid Use Disorder: Implementaton Research on Medication Assisted Treatment in JailsK23DA045934 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUFRIN, CAROLYN · 2018 to 2021
$883k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA045934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many pregnant individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) spend time in jail, yet access to standard of care medications for OUD (MOUD) in jail is limited. Though qualitative studies of non-incarcerated pregnant and non-pregnant incarcerated individuals with OUD demonstrate complexities that must be considered in delivering effective care, studies with pregnant, incarcerated patients with OUD are lacking. Methods: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews from October 2020-November 2021 with pregnant and postpartum people with OUD who were currently or previously in jail in Florida, Maryland, Ohio, and Virginia. Interview guides incorporated understandings of the power dynamics of incarceration and gendered expectations of motherhood. We analyzed transcripts using descriptive phenomenology to identify themes around experiences of treatment or withdrawal in jail and upon release. Results: We interviewed 32 women, 23 pregnant and nine postpartum. Some received MOUD in jail and others endured withdrawal. All participants expressed concern for their babies. Five themes emerged: 1)lack of counseling or accurate information about MOUD in pregnancy; 2)absent, delayed, or coercive care in jail; 3)experiences of stigma and discrimination from staff and caregivers; 4)structural barriers to safe transitions and continuing MOUD; and 5)the destructive presence of child protective services for care continuity. These factors all influenced their ability to recover. Conclusions: Jails must provide OUD care that is attentive to pregnancy physiology, pregnancy-stigma, reentry needs, and patients' fetal-newborn concerns. Tailoring care specific to pregnancy and postpartum context can improve recovery success, reduce overdose, and promote intergenerational equity.

Identifiers

PMID39748911
PMCPMC11694624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.