Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748893›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Education2024

Education Research: The MANET Project: Museum Art in Neurology Education Training.

Tatiana Greige, David Odo, Camran Mani, Stephanie Bissonnette, Pria Anand

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tatiana GreigeFrom the Department of Neurology (T.G., P.A.), Boston Medical Center, MA; Georgia Museum of Art (D.O.), Athens; Harvard Art Museums (C.M.), Cambridge, MA; and Department of Neurology (S.B.), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5698-0875
David OdoFrom the Department of Neurology (T.G., P.A.), Boston Medical Center, MA; Georgia Museum of Art (D.O.), Athens; Harvard Art Museums (C.M.), Cambridge, MA; and Department of Neurology (S.B.), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Camran ManiFrom the Department of Neurology (T.G., P.A.), Boston Medical Center, MA; Georgia Museum of Art (D.O.), Athens; Harvard Art Museums (C.M.), Cambridge, MA; and Department of Neurology (S.B.), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Stephanie BissonnetteFrom the Department of Neurology (T.G., P.A.), Boston Medical Center, MA; Georgia Museum of Art (D.O.), Athens; Harvard Art Museums (C.M.), Cambridge, MA; and Department of Neurology (S.B.), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3963-3337
Pria AnandFrom the Department of Neurology (T.G., P.A.), Boston Medical Center, MA; Georgia Museum of Art (D.O.), Athens; Harvard Art Museums (C.M.), Cambridge, MA; and Department of Neurology (S.B.), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7421-7750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Multiple studies have shown that visual arts training has improved observational and communication skills and empathy among medical students and resident physicians. The benefits of such training for neurology residents remain scarce. This project aims to introduce neurology residents to the world of visual arts, improve their observational skills, foster their empathic skills, and provide them with a unique space for self-expression. Methods: Neurology residents at an urban tertiary academic medical center in the northeastern United States received multiple custom-designed art observation training sessions at the Fogg Museum. Sessions were led by professional art educators and involved visiting multiple galleries in-person. Residents completed preintervention and postintervention tests to assess for change in their observational skills. The test was composed of artwork, MRIs, and videos with neurologic findings, which were all graded using a priori rubrics. The primary outcome was the difference between preintervention and postintervention total test scores. Secondary outcomes included the differences between preintervention and postintervention scores for art imagery and clinical imagery. Two-tailed paired Student t test was used. Results: Seventeen neurology residents attended the museum art sessions throughout the academic year and 12 (71%) residents completed both the preintervention and postintervention tests. Observational skills, as calculated by the total score, improved significantly between the preintervention and postintervention tests (mean score 22.75 vs 33.5, respectively, Discussion: Residents' observational skills improved significantly throughout the academic year. This study emphasizes the importance of visual arts in neurology training. Art can further develop residents' observational skills, foster their empathy and humanity, and provide them with a safe space for self-reflection and personal growth.

Identifiers

PMID39748893
PMCPMC11694775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.