Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748871›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Evaluating prevalence, risk factors, and diagnostic techniques for

Manahil Rafiq, Naimat Ullah Khan, Imad Khan, Mansoor Ahmad, Aiman Bibi, Mourad Ben Said, Hanène Belkahia, Muhammad Tariq, Silwat Saeed, Mostafa A Abdel-Maksoud and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Veterinary world · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Epidemiological overview ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Manahil RafiqDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Naimat Ullah KhanCollege of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Imad KhanCollege of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Mansoor AhmadDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Aiman BibiDepartment of Chemistry, Hazara University Mansehra, Mansehra, Pakistan.
Mourad Ben SaidDepartment of Basic Sciences, Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Manouba, Tunisia.
Hanène BelkahiaLaboratory of Microbiology, National School of Veterinary Medicine of Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Manouba, Tunisia.
Muhammad TariqCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Silwat SaeedInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Mostafa A Abdel-MaksoudBotany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed A El-TayebBotany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sabiha FatimaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Bushra Hafeez KianiDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States.
Akram A AlfuraydiBotany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Farhad BadshahDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: A total of 300 fecal and 300 water samples were collected from goats and water sources in four geographic regions: Tehsil Katlang, Tehsil Takhtbhai, Tehsil Mardan, and Tehsil Lundkhwarh. Samples were categorized based on gender, age group (<1 year, 1-2 years, and >2 years), diarrheal status, and feeding regime (stall feeding, grazing). The two staining methods, ZN and KAF staining, were employed to detect Results: The overall detection rates of Conclusion: Both ZN and KAF staining methods are effective for detecting

Indexed as

cryptosporidiosisCryptosporidium oocystsgoatsPakistanrisk factorswater sources

Identifiers

PMID39748871
PMCPMC11693644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.