ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Efficient detection of eyes on potato tubers using deep-learning for robotic high-throughput sampling.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based text generation for plant phenotyping and precision agriculture.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular-based detection of pathogens from potato tubers hold promise, but the initial sample extraction process is labor-intensive. Developing a robotic tuber sampling system, equipped with a fast and precise machine vision technique to identify optimal sampling locations on a potato tuber, offers a viable solution. However, detecting sampling locations such as eyes and stolon scar is challenging due to variability in their appearance, size, and shape, along with soil adhering to the tubers. In this study, we addressed these challenges by evaluating various deep-learning-based object detectors, encompassing You Look Only Once (YOLO) variants of YOLOv5, YOLOv6, YOLOv7, YOLOv8, YOLOv9, YOLOv10, and YOLO11, for detecting eyes and stolon scars across a range of diverse potato cultivars. A robust image dataset obtained from tubers of five potato cultivars (three russet skinned, a red skinned, and a purple skinned) was developed as a benchmark for detection of these sampling locations. The mean average precision at an intersection over union threshold of 0.5 (mAP@0.5) ranged from 0.832 and 0.854 with YOLOv5n to 0.903 and 0.914 with YOLOv10l. Among all the tested models, YOLOv10m showed the optimal trade-off between detection accuracy (mAP@0.5 of 0.911) and inference time (92 ms), along with satisfactory generalization performance when cross-validated among the cultivars used in this study. The model benchmarking and inferences of this study provide insights for advancing the development of a robotic potato tuber sampling device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.