ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
A global analysis of plant nutrient limitation affected by atmospheric nitrogen and phosphorous deposition.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Long-Term Nutrient Input on Progeny Seed Nutrient Contents, Germination and Early Growth Characteristics of Typical Coastal Wetland Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leaf carbon nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in dominant trees across China's forests from 2005 to 2020.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Net Primary Productivity of Vegetation on Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountains Based on CASA Model, China.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nutrient Additions Regulate Height Growth Rate but Not Biomass Growth Rate of Alpine Plants Through the Contrasting Effect of Total and Available Nitrogen.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uncovering the response of plant functional types (PFTs) to nutrient limitation caused by atmospheric deposition is critical for assessing the health of terrestrial ecosystems under climate change conditions. However, it remains unclear how atmospheric deposition and underlying ecological factors affect PFTs globally. To address this, we compiled a global dataset of four PFTs, i.e., herb, evergreen broad-leaf (EB), deciduous broad-leaf (DB), and conifer (CO), and utilized both linear mixed-effects models and structural equation models to describe the thresholds of their net primary productivity (NPP), and tested the relationships between their NPP and potential environmental drivers based on the N/P threshold hypothesis. We found that atmospheric N and P deposition non-linearly affected NPP and the effects were most pronounced for the EB, DB, and CO categories, with tipping points in the ranges of 8.32-9.33 kg N·ha
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.