Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748775›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2025

Combination of Hotspot Mutations With Methylation and Fragmentomic Profiles to Enhance Multi-Cancer Early Detection.

Thi Hue Hanh Nguyen, Giang Hoang Vu, Tu Thi Nguyen, Tuan Anh Nguyen, Vu Uyen Tran, Luyen Thi Vu, Giang Thi Huong Nguyen, Nhat Duy Nguyen, Trung Hieu Tran, Van Thien Chi Nguyen and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Thi Hue Hanh NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Giang Hoang VuMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Tu Thi NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Tuan Anh NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Vu Uyen TranMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Luyen Thi VuMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Giang Thi Huong NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Nhat Duy NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Trung Hieu TranMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Van Thien Chi NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thanh Dat NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Trong Hieu NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Dac Ho VoMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Tuong Vi VanMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thanh Thi DoMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Minh Phong LeMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Le Anh Khoa HuynhMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Duy Sinh NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Hung Sang TangMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Hoai-Nghia NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Minh-Duy PhanMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Hoa GiangMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Lan N TuMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-8554
Le Son TranMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-3903

Funding

Gene Solutions (K-Discovery)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMulti-cancer early detection (MCED) through a single blood test significantly advances cancer diagnosis. However, most MCED tests rely on a single type of biomarkers, leading to limited sensitivity, particularly for early-stage cancers. We previously developed SPOT-MAS, a multimodal ctDNA-based assay analyzing methylation and fragmentomic profiles to detect five common cancers. Despite its potential, SPOT-MAS exhibited moderate sensitivities for early-stage cancers. This study investigated whether integrating hotspot mutations into SPOT-MAS could enhance its detection rates.

methodA targeted amplicon sequencing approach was developed to profile 700 hotspot mutations in cell-free DNA and integrated into the SPOT-MAS assay, creating a single-blood draw workflow. This workflow, namely SPOT-MAS Plus was retrospectively validated in a cohort of 255 non-metastatic cancer patients (breast, colorectal, gastric, liver, and lung) and 304 healthy individuals.

resultsHotspot mutations were detected in 131 of 255 (51.4%) cancer patients, with the highest rates in liver cancer (96.5%), followed by colorectal (59.3%) and lung cancer (53.7%). Lower detection rates were found for cancers with low tumor mutational burden, such as breast (31.3%) and gastric (41.9%) cancers. In contrast, SPOT-MAS demonstrated higher sensitivities for these cancers (51.6% for breast and 62.9% for gastric). The combination of hotspot mutations with SPOT-MAS predictions improved early-stage cancer detection, achieving an overall sensitivity of 78.5% at a specificity of 97.7%. Enhanced sensitivities were observed for colorectal (81.36%) and lung cancer (82.9%).

conclusionThe integration of genetic and epigenetic alterations into a multimodal assay significantly enhances the early detection of various cancers. Further validation in larger cohorts is necessary to support broader clinical applications.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationEarly Detection of CancerMutationAdultAgedCirculating Tumor DNAFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcfDNAgenetic and epigenetic alterationshotspot mutationsMCED

Identifiers

PMID39748775
PMCPMC11695824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.