ReviewMolecular ecology resources2025
Reframing Formalin: A Molecular Opportunity Enabling Historical Epigenomics and Retrospective Gene Expression Studies.
Review in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA Integrity of Chironomids and Oligochaetes Is Maintained During Long-Term Storage in Neutral Buffered Formalin: Implications for Macroinvertebrate Monitoring.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Novel 20th century rotavirus alphagastroenteritidis strains identified in formalin-fixed and ethanol-preserved museum specimens.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Molecular Potential and Interpretability of DNA in Historical Spirit Collection Media.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Recovery of an 18bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Editorial 2026.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- The rise of historical epigenomics and temporal analysis of gene regulation.Genome biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Formalin preservation of museum specimens has long been considered a barrier to molecular research due to extensive crosslinking and chemical modification. However, recent optimisation of hot alkaline lysis and proteinase K digestion DNA extraction methods have enabled a growing number of studies to overcome these challenges and conduct genome-wide re-sequencing and targeted locus-specific sequencing. The newest, and perhaps most unexpected utility of formalin preservation in archival samples is its ability to preserve in situ DNA-protein interactions at a molecular level. Retrieving this signal provides information about the relative compaction or accessibility of the genome to the transcriptional machinery required for gene expression. Thus, exposure to formalin essentially corresponds to taking a snapshot of organism-wide gene expression at the time of death. While DNA methylation and RNA-Seq analyses of dried tissues have provided glimpses into historical gene regulation, these techniques were previously limited to skeletal or desiccated remains, offering only partial insights. By examining fluid-preserved specimens, molecular tools can now be applied to a broader range of tissues, enabling more detailed tissue-specific gene regulation profiling across vertebrates. In this review, we chronicle the historical use of formaldehyde in collections and discuss how targeted chromatin profiling with assays like MNase-seq and FAIRE-seq are surmounting fixation challenges and unlocking invaluable insights into historical genomes and gene expression profiles. The deeper integration of molecular genetics with museum collections bridges the gap between past and present and provides a vital tool that could help us predict and mitigate some of the impacts of future environmental change, novel pathogens, or invasive species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.